Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Alumni
  • Login
  • Volunteer
  • Clubs
  • Reunions
  • Magazine
  • Class Notes
  • Help
  • Give Now
  • Stories
  • Alumni Directory
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Careers
  • Programs & Events
  • Giving
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Alumni→
  • Stories→

Stories

Stories

01 Dec 2017

Diagnosing DC’s Dysfunction

Re: Michael E. Porter (Bishop William Lawrence University Professor, Emeritus); By: Julia Hanna
Topics: Government and Politics-Political ElectionsGovernment and Politics-Government LegislationSociety-Civil Society or CommunityCompetition-Competitiveness
ShareBar

Washington isn’t broken. It’s thriving. The real problem is that our political system benefits the major political parties and their industry allies—not the people it was designed to serve. That’s according to “Why Competition in the Politics Industry Is Failing America,” a recent report out of the School’s US Competitiveness Project from business leader Katherine Gehl and University Professor Michael Porter. Gehl and Porter use the lens of industry competition to analyze the US political system and propose a strategy for reform and innovation.

MORE

• Read the full report

MORE

• Read the full report

“The politics industry is different from virtually all other industries in the economy because the participants themselves control the rules of competition,” write Gehl and Porter. “There is no truly independent regulation of politics that protects the public interest.” The current two-party structure is a textbook duopoly, they add, surrounded by a “political industrial complex” of special interests, donors, and lobbyists, resulting in competition that fails to deliver what citizens should expect: practical and effective policies that address the nation’s problems; action on those policies; leadership that unites and inspires; and respect for the Constitution and rights of all citizens.

While this probably sounds familiar—and depressing— Gehl and Porter emphasize that it is entirely fixable. Their strategy for reforming the system encompasses a variety of actions to restructure the election process, from moving to a single primary ballot for all candidates to instituting nonpartisan redistricting. They also propose restructuring the governing process by aligning legislative and governance rules with the public interest; shifting the incentives for politicians to respond to constituents rather than donors; and opening up competition as early as the 2018 election cycle to centrist, solutions-oriented independent candidates, among other recommendations.

“We citizens bear the ultimate responsibility for knowing what is good for our society and insisting on change,” the authors conclude. “We have the power to take it back, and we must.”

ShareBar

Post a Comment

Featured Faculty

Michael E. Porter
Bishop William Lawrence University Professor, Emeritus

Related Stories

    • 01 Dec 2022
    • HBS Alumni Bulletin

    Research Brief: Pocket Change

    Re: Vincent Pons (Byron Wien Professor of Business Administration); By: Jill Radsken
    • 25 Aug 2022
    • HBS Alumni Bulletin

    3-Minute Briefing: Arnon Mishkin (MBA 1989)

    • 28 Jul 2021
    • Harvard Magazine

    Governance Reform and Shared Value

    Re: Michael E. Porter (Bishop William Lawrence University Professor, Emeritus)
    • 15 Jun 2021
    • HBS Alumni Bulletin

    Turning Point: Tell Me More

    Re: Diane Hessan (MBA 1977)

More Related Stories

 
 
 
ǁ
Campus Map
External Relations
Harvard Business School
Teele Hall
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
Phone: 1.617.495.6890
Email: alumni+hbs.edu
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College.