Stories
Stories
Totting Up the Bill for the Iraq War
The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict (W.W. Norton, 2008) is not just about money. The “true costs,” argue authors Joseph E. Stiglitz and Linda J. Bilmes (MBA ’84), are the lost opportunities that the United States could have pursued: expanding services for its own citizens, offering crucially needed leadership on the world stage, and improving domestic security.
The authors, who opposed the war from the start, begin by estimating the actual financial cost of operating the Afghanistan and Iraq wars at $2.7 trillion. (Before the wars, the Bush White House estimated the bill would be $50 billion.) Next comes a question: What could we have done with the money had we not gone to war? According to the National Priorities Project, a trillion dollars in spending could have begun significant repair of the Social Security system, or hired 15 million public school teachers, or built 8 million housing units, or underwritten 120 million children in Head Start, or offered some 40 million university scholarships.
A more difficult calculation follows. What are the hidden economic costs, such as future medical and psychological services for veterans? The number that Stiglitz, a winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics, and Bilmes, a government finance expert at Harvard’s Kennedy School, arrive at is even more staggering: $5 trillion. They posit, for example, that the war, by creating uncertainty in oil futures markets, has added $35 per barrel to the price of oil, an assertion they made long before the recent run-up in oil prices.
Finances aside, the United States has lost something more: prestige and power. “In the long run, the squandering of America’s leadership role in the international community, and the diversion of attention from critical global issues — including issues like global warming . . . that won’t go away on their own and simply cannot wait to be addressed — may represent the largest and most long-standing legacy of this unfortunate war.”
The book closes as one would hope: with proposals for change. The eighteen measures include political and legal modifications to make war authorization more difficult, greater transparency on actual war spending, improved services for vets, and a “war tax” on individuals so that the war’s consequences are felt directly by citizens.
The White House has come down hard on the numbers and message of The Three Trillion Dollar War, but by offering a detailed, devastating accounting of the human, financial, political, and social costs of the war, this could be regarded as one of the best antiwar books ever written.
— Sean Silverthorne
Post a Comment
Related Stories
-
- 01 Mar 2024
- HBS Alumni Bulletin
The War Within
Re: Elizabeth Ames (MBA 1985); Elaine Klein (MBA 1985); Colin Greenstreet (MBA 1985); By: Janelle Nanos; illustration by Daniel Bejar -
- 10 Oct 2023
- HBS News
HBS Responds to the Attacks on Israel
-
- 21 Dec 2022
- HBS Alumni News
HBS Community Comes Together in Wake of Ukraine Invasion
-
- 27 Apr 2022
- SeattleMet
Following the Flow of Aid
Re: Tjada McKenna (MBA 2002)
Stories Featuring Linda Bilmes
-
- 24 Sep 2019
- Harvard Gazette
National Parks’ Economic Benefits Put at Over $100B Annually
Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984) -
- 01 Sep 2016
- HBS Alumni Bulletin
Pricing Paradise
Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984); By: Julia Hanna -
- 01 Jun 2009
- Alumni Stories
Alumni Books
Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984); Scott Anthony (MBA 2001); Mark Blaxill (MBA 1984); Jo Whitehead (MBA 1985); Andy Campbell (MBA 1978); George Moseley (MBA 1965); Rachel Greenwald (MBA 1993); Dennis Powers (MBA 1969)