Skip to Main Content
HBS Home
  • About
  • Academic Programs
  • Alumni
  • Faculty & Research
  • Baker Library
  • Giving
  • Harvard Business Review
  • Initiatives
  • News
  • Recruit
  • Map / Directions
Alumni
  • Login
  • Volunteer
  • Clubs
  • Reunions
  • Bulletin
  • Class Notes
  • Help
  • Give Now
  • Stories
  • Alumni Directory
  • Lifelong Learning
  • Careers
  • Programs & Events
  • Giving
  • …→
  • Harvard Business School→
  • Alumni→
  • Stories→

Stories

Stories

01 Sep 2016

Pricing Paradise

Calculating the value of America’s national parks
Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984); By: Julia Hanna
Topics: Environment-Natural EnvironmentResearch-AnalysisSociety-Public OpinionValue-Valuation
ShareBar

Photo by Webb Chappell

How much is the Grand Canyon worth? What would you pay to prevent developers from building condos on the Cape Cod National Seashore? As difficult as it may seem to answer those questions, Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984) has made it her business to do so in this, the National Park Service’s centennial year. The Daniel Patrick Moynihan Senior Lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School, Bilmes began her career at the Boston Consulting Group, focusing on cost structures in large-scale industries where fractional commodity fluctuations result in global price shifts. After she was appointed by President Bill Clinton as assistant secretary and CFO of the Department of Commerce, Bilmes’s attention shifted to government spending.

“The government is good at making promises, but poor at valuing what those promises are going to cost,” says Bilmes, coauthor of the 2008 book The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. “The mission of the National Park Service is to protect these resources in perpetuity, but that’s difficult to do when you don’t have a total economic value for that resource.”

Previous attempts at determining economic value focused on direct-use factors such as visitor spending in and around the parks. Using a more comprehensive approach that also takes into account indirect or passive use—in other words, our desire for the parks to always be there for us and our children, whether or not we visit them—Bilmes and coauthors at Colorado State University undertook a study that estimates a total economic value for the parks, including the annual amount a participant was willing to pay to prevent the loss of 20 percent of US National Parks and programs. (A series of focus groups determined that most participants found it unlikely that all parks would be eliminated; a 20 percent loss due to budget cuts was deemed a realistic possibility.) The researchers adopted the “willingness-to-pay” methodology that federal agencies such as OSHA and the FDA use to determine how much people would pay to avoid injury. Based on this method, Bilmes found that the US population is willing to pay $92 billion a year to protect, or not lose, the national parks and the service’s key programs such as education and historical preservation.

Further studies by Bilmes and student researchers focus on additional values provided by the national parks that have never been measured, including carbon sequestration, watershed protection, and the creation of intellectual property. (Star Wars director George Lucas, for example, found Death Valley National Park to be the perfect locale for Luke Skywalker’s home planet of Tatooine.) The work, which is ongoing, will culminate in a book to be published next year.

Bilmes cautions that the $92 billion figure is highly conservative for several reasons, above all because the team attributed zero value to households that failed to return the research survey (even though the failure to respond was mostly due to participants not having time to complete it, according to an audit).

“We can never fully value natural capital,” she adds, citing the Amazon rain forest’s “carbon sink” role as an example. Still she hopes that providing a wider lens for viewing the parks’ total economic value will make it easier to think more broadly about establishing new financing streams. “The parks are funded through an annual appropriation of about $2.5 billion, which is subject to all the usual political negotiations,” she notes. “In real terms, that amount has been declining every year for the past 15 years.” Tax-exempt green bonds, for example, and a funded endowment could help ensure that the national parks are around for the enjoyment of future generations.

ShareBar

Featured Alumni

Linda Bilmes
MBA 1984

Post a Comment

Featured Alumni

Linda Bilmes
MBA 1984

Related Stories

    • 12 Jan 2021
    • The Harvard Gazette

    Keeping the Coast Clear

    Re: Jon Stone (MBA 1984)
    • 24 Sep 2019
    • Harvard Gazette

    National Parks’ Economic Benefits Put at Over $100B Annually

    Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984)
    • 04 Sep 2019
    • HBS Alumni Bulletin

    Deep Dive

    Re: Victor Vescovo (MBA 1994); Ray Dalio (MBA 1973); Mike Bloomberg (MBA 1966); By: April White; photo by Jeff Wilson
    • 28 May 2019
    • HBS Alumni Bulletin

    Turning Point: Into the Wild

    Re: Alexandra McReynolds (MBA 1984)

More Related Stories

Stories Featuring Linda Bilmes

    • 24 Sep 2019
    • Harvard Gazette

    National Parks’ Economic Benefits Put at Over $100B Annually

    Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984)
    • 01 Jun 2009
    • Alumni Stories

    Alumni Books

    Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984); Scott Anthony (MBA 2001); Mark Blaxill (MBA 1984); Jo Whitehead (MBA 1985); Andy Campbell (MBA 1978); George Moseley (MBA 1965); Rachel Greenwald (MBA 1993); Dennis Powers (MBA 1969)
    • 01 Sep 2008
    • Alumni Stories

    Totting Up the Bill for the Iraq War

    Re: Linda Bilmes (MBA 1984); By: Sean Silverthorne
 
 
 
 
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
  • Explore
ǁ
Campus Map
External Relations
Harvard Business School
Teele Hall
Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
Phone: 1.617.495.6890
Email: alumni+hbs.edu
→Map & Directions
→More Contact Information
  • Make a Gift
  • Site Map
  • Jobs
  • Harvard University
  • Trademarks
  • Policies
  • Accessibility
  • Digital Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
Copyright © President & Fellows of Harvard College